Aruba vs Dominican Republic: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Aruba
175,500 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Dominican Republic
210,739 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
12th
Dominican Republic rank
10th

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Dominican Republic
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196819952023

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 210,739 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 175,500 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 35,239 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Dominican Republic's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 12th and Dominican Republic ranks 10th of 174 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Dominican Republic in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 8,238 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 17,929 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 9,691 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2000s 6,070 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 50,974 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 44,904 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic
2010s 189,167 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 104,121 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 85,045 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 174,285 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 200,399 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 26,114 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Dominican Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Aruba or Dominican Republic?
Dominican Republic, at 210,739 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 175,500 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Aruba and Dominican Republic?
35,239 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Dominican Republic?
32 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Dominican Republic rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 12th and Dominican Republic ranks 10th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Dominican Republic: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/dominican-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-transfers-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/dominican-republic/">Aruba vs Dominican Republic: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
217 places, 5,924 data points, 1968–2023
Last refreshed

Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.