Gambia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per capita
Gambia
188.64 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
180.03 BoP, current US$ per person
in 2018
Gambia rank
67th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
68th
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per capita over time
- Gambia
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 188.64 BoP, current US$ per person against 180.03 BoP, current US$ per person in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 8.61 BoP, current US$ per person.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 67th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 68th of 177 countries.
Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per capita, Gambia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Gambia, at 188.64 BoP, current US$ per person against 180.03 BoP, current US$ per person in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per capita between Gambia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 8.61 BoP, current US$ per person, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
- How do Gambia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for personal transfers, receipts (bop, current us$), per capita?
- Gambia ranks 67th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 68th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Personal transfers, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.