Italy vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP
Italy
0.005 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0057 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2018
Italy rank
150th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
147th
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP over time
- Italy
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0057 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.005 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Italy, a difference of 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.
Italy ranks 150th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 147th of 196 countries.
Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per unit of gdp, Italy or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0057 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.005 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Italy as of 2018.
- What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per unit of gdp between Italy and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
- How do Italy and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per unit of gdp?
- Italy ranks 150th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 147th of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.