Georgia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP

Georgia
0.1117 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.0139 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Georgia rank
26th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
24th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Georgia
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
00.050.10.15197019972025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0.1117 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0139 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0978 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Georgia's figure about 8.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Georgia ranks 26th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 24th of 196 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1043 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0083 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.096 current US$ per US$ of GDP Georgia
2000s 0.0758 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0167 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0591 current US$ per US$ of GDP Georgia
2010s 0.1066 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0233 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0834 current US$ per US$ of GDP Georgia
2020s 0.1322 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0221 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1101 current US$ per US$ of GDP Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per unit of gdp, Georgia or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Georgia, at 0.1117 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0139 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per unit of gdp between Georgia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
0.0978 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
29 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2025.
How do Georgia and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Georgia ranks 26th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 24th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/georgia/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/georgia/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Georgia vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 9,663 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.