Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs French Polynesia: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.0118 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
French Polynesia
0.1058 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2016
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
30th
French Polynesia rank
29th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • French Polynesia
00.0250.050.0750.10.125198820062025

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 0.1058 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0118 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.094 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes French Polynesia's figure about 9.0 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 15 years both countries report, French Polynesia has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and French Polynesia ranks 29th of 47 groups.

French Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) French Polynesia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0134 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1048 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0914 current US$ per US$ of GDP French Polynesia
2010s 0.0139 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1093 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0953 current US$ per US$ of GDP French Polynesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) or French Polynesia?
French Polynesia, at 0.1058 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0118 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2016.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and French Polynesia?
0.094 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and French Polynesia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
How do Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) and French Polynesia rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and French Polynesia ranks 29th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs French Polynesia: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/french-polynesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/french-polynesia/">Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) vs French Polynesia: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 9,663 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.