Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre

Turks and Caicos Islands
7,876 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Zimbabwe
8,534 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
117th
Zimbabwe rank
114th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Turks and Caicos Islands
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197720002023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8,534 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,876 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 658 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 194 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre, Turks and Caicos Islands or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8,534 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,876 current US$ per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre between Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
658 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe?
5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
How do Turks and Caicos Islands and Zimbabwe rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 117th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/zimbabwe/">Turks and Caicos Islands vs Zimbabwe: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,259 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.