Indonesia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre
Indonesia
7,644 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
7,876 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
Indonesia rank
118th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
117th
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre over time
- Indonesia
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 7,876 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,644 current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia, a difference of 232 current US$ per square kilometre.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.
Indonesia ranks 118th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 117th of 194 countries.
Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre, Indonesia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 7,876 current US$ per square kilometre against 7,644 current US$ per square kilometre in Indonesia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre between Indonesia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 232 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
- How do Indonesia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre?
- Indonesia ranks 118th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 117th of 194 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.