Hong Kong, China vs Palestine, State of: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
432,161 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine, State of
538,465 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
8th
Palestine, State of rank
6th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Palestine, State of
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k199520092023

How they compare

Palestine, State of currently reports 538,465 current US$ per square kilometre against 432,161 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 106,304 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine, State of's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 8th and Palestine, State of ranks 6th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Palestine, State of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 135,284 current US$ per square kilometre 178,948 current US$ per square kilometre 43,664 current US$ per square kilometre Palestine, State of
2000s 226,596 current US$ per square kilometre 101,111 current US$ per square kilometre 125,486 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 370,445 current US$ per square kilometre 321,752 current US$ per square kilometre 48,693 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 417,129 current US$ per square kilometre 587,627 current US$ per square kilometre 170,498 current US$ per square kilometre Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Palestine, State of?
Palestine, State of, at 538,465 current US$ per square kilometre against 432,161 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of?
106,304 current US$ per square kilometre, with Palestine, State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Palestine, State of rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 8th and Palestine, State of ranks 6th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Palestine, State of: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/west-bank-and-gaza/">Hong Kong, China vs Palestine, State of: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,259 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.