Hong Kong, China vs San Marino: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
432,161 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
San Marino
371,502 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
8th
San Marino rank
11th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • San Marino
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199820102023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 432,161 current US$ per square kilometre against 371,502 current US$ per square kilometre in San Marino, a difference of 60,659 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.2 times San Marino's.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 8th and San Marino ranks 11th of 194 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China San Marino Difference Ahead
2010s 416,736 current US$ per square kilometre 292,536 current US$ per square kilometre 124,200 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 417,129 current US$ per square kilometre 345,194 current US$ per square kilometre 71,936 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or San Marino?
Hong Kong, China, at 432,161 current US$ per square kilometre against 371,502 current US$ per square kilometre in San Marino as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and San Marino?
60,659 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and San Marino?
7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and San Marino rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 8th and San Marino ranks 11th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs San Marino: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/san-marino/">Hong Kong, China vs San Marino: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,259 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.