Guatemala vs OECD members: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre

Guatemala
186,460 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
6,921 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
19th
OECD members rank
21st

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • OECD members
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k197019962023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 186,460 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,921 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 179,539 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 26.9 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 47 shared years of data; in 1977 it was OECD members ahead.

Guatemala ranks 19th and OECD members ranks 21st of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 4 and OECD members in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 184.15 current US$ per square kilometre 415.99 current US$ per square kilometre 231.84 current US$ per square kilometre OECD members
1980s 187.76 current US$ per square kilometre 724.15 current US$ per square kilometre 536.39 current US$ per square kilometre OECD members
1990s 2,908 current US$ per square kilometre 1,479 current US$ per square kilometre 1,430 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 25,229 current US$ per square kilometre 2,900 current US$ per square kilometre 22,329 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 62,626 current US$ per square kilometre 4,691 current US$ per square kilometre 57,935 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 151,639 current US$ per square kilometre 6,223 current US$ per square kilometre 145,416 current US$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre, Guatemala or OECD members?
Guatemala, at 186,460 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,921 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre between Guatemala and OECD members?
179,539 current US$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and OECD members?
47 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and OECD members rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 19th and OECD members ranks 21st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs OECD members: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/oecd-members/">Guatemala vs OECD members: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,259 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.