Curaçao vs Hong Kong, China: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre

Curaçao
397,766 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
432,161 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Curaçao rank
10th
Hong Kong, China rank
8th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Curaçao
  • Hong Kong, China
100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199820102023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 432,161 current US$ per square kilometre against 397,766 current US$ per square kilometre in Curaçao, a difference of 34,395 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Curaçao's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curaçao ahead.

Curaçao ranks 10th and Hong Kong, China ranks 8th of 194 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curaçao Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
2010s 336,606 current US$ per square kilometre 375,672 current US$ per square kilometre 39,066 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 343,119 current US$ per square kilometre 417,129 current US$ per square kilometre 74,010 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre, Curaçao or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 432,161 current US$ per square kilometre against 397,766 current US$ per square kilometre in Curaçao as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre between Curaçao and Hong Kong, China?
34,395 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Hong Kong, China?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curaçao and Hong Kong, China rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre?
Curaçao ranks 10th and Hong Kong, China ranks 8th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curaçao vs Hong Kong, China: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/hong-kong-sar-china/">Curaçao vs Hong Kong, China: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,259 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.