Curaçao vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre

Curaçao
397,766 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
10,674 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Curaçao rank
10th
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
11th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Curaçao
  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k197419982023

How they compare

Curaçao currently reports 397,766 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,674 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 387,092 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Curaçao's figure about 37.3 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Curaçao has been ahead every year.

Curaçao ranks 10th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 11th of 194 countries.

Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curaçao Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2010s 336,606 current US$ per square kilometre 6,890 current US$ per square kilometre 329,717 current US$ per square kilometre Curaçao
2020s 343,119 current US$ per square kilometre 9,860 current US$ per square kilometre 333,259 current US$ per square kilometre Curaçao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre, Curaçao or Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
Curaçao, at 397,766 current US$ per square kilometre against 10,674 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre between Curaçao and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
387,092 current US$ per square kilometre, with Curaçao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curaçao and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curaçao and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre?
Curaçao ranks 10th and Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 11th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curaçao vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/">Curaçao vs Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,259 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.