Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre

Belarus
8,310 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8,534 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
115th
Zimbabwe rank
114th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k197720002023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 8,534 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,310 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 224 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 17 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Belarus ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre 57.92 current US$ per square kilometre 55.95 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 2,483 current US$ per square kilometre 3,117 current US$ per square kilometre 633.59 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 5,415 current US$ per square kilometre 4,580 current US$ per square kilometre 835.18 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 7,296 current US$ per square kilometre 6,974 current US$ per square kilometre 321.29 current US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre, Belarus or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 8,534 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,310 current US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre between Belarus and Zimbabwe?
224 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Zimbabwe?
17 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Zimbabwe rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 115th and Zimbabwe ranks 114th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/zimbabwe/">Belarus vs Zimbabwe: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,259 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.