Bangladesh vs OECD members: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre

Bangladesh
169,795 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
6,921 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
20th
OECD members rank
21st

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Bangladesh
  • OECD members
050.0k100.0k150.0k197019962023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 169,795 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,921 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 162,874 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 24.5 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was OECD members ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 21st of 194 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 737.9 current US$ per square kilometre 371.5 current US$ per square kilometre 366.4 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 4,408 current US$ per square kilometre 724.15 current US$ per square kilometre 3,684 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1990s 9,298 current US$ per square kilometre 1,479 current US$ per square kilometre 7,820 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2000s 38,005 current US$ per square kilometre 2,900 current US$ per square kilometre 35,105 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2010s 109,240 current US$ per square kilometre 4,691 current US$ per square kilometre 104,548 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
2020s 168,145 current US$ per square kilometre 6,223 current US$ per square kilometre 161,922 current US$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre, Bangladesh or OECD members?
Bangladesh, at 169,795 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,921 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre between Bangladesh and OECD members?
162,874 current US$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and OECD members?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and OECD members rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per square kilometre?
Bangladesh ranks 20th and OECD members ranks 21st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs OECD members: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/oecd-members/">Bangladesh vs OECD members: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,259 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.