East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guyana: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
48.47 current US$ per person
in 2025
Guyana
660.23 current US$ per person
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
37th
Guyana rank
34th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Guyana
0200400600197119982025

How they compare

Guyana currently reports 660.23 current US$ per person against 48.47 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 611.76 current US$ per person.

That makes Guyana's figure about 13.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Guyana ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th and Guyana ranks 34th of 47 groups.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Guyana Difference Ahead
1980s 1.65 current US$ per person 2.61 current US$ per person 0.9618 current US$ per person Guyana
1990s 4.77 current US$ per person 11.38 current US$ per person 6.6 current US$ per person Guyana
2000s 13.64 current US$ per person 209.37 current US$ per person 195.73 current US$ per person Guyana
2010s 34.82 current US$ per person 468.04 current US$ per person 433.22 current US$ per person Guyana
2020s 38.74 current US$ per person 635.34 current US$ per person 596.6 current US$ per person Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Guyana?
Guyana, at 660.23 current US$ per person against 48.47 current US$ per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guyana?
611.76 current US$ per person, with Guyana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guyana?
35 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Guyana rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 37th and Guyana ranks 34th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guyana: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guyana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/guyana/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Guyana: Personal remittances, received (current US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 9,733 data points, 1970–2025
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, received (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.