Least developed countries vs Pakistan: Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate

Least developed countries
-38.34 % change on previous year
in 2025
Pakistan
15.94 % change on previous year
in 2025
Least developed countries rank
40th
Pakistan rank
40th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Pakistan
0100200300197219982025

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 15.94 % change on previous year against -38.34 % change on previous year in Least developed countries, a difference of 54.28 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 24 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Pakistan ahead.

Least developed countries ranks 40th and Pakistan ranks 40th of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Least developed countries averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Pakistan Difference Ahead
1970s 35.29 % change on previous year 58.88 % change on previous year 23.59 % change on previous year Pakistan
1980s 12.69 % change on previous year 4.14 % change on previous year 8.55 % change on previous year Least developed countries
1990s 8.35 % change on previous year -4.94 % change on previous year 13.29 % change on previous year Least developed countries
2000s 15.07 % change on previous year 28.46 % change on previous year 13.39 % change on previous year Pakistan
2010s 8.18 % change on previous year 10.08 % change on previous year 1.9 % change on previous year Pakistan
2020s -1.35 % change on previous year 11.51 % change on previous year 12.85 % change on previous year Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), annual growth rate, Least developed countries or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 15.94 % change on previous year against -38.34 % change on previous year in Least developed countries as of 2025.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), annual growth rate between Least developed countries and Pakistan?
54.28 % change on previous year, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Pakistan?
49 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2025.
How do Least developed countries and Pakistan rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), annual growth rate?
Least developed countries ranks 40th and Pakistan ranks 40th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Pakistan: Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-un-classification/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-annual-growth-rate/least-developed-countries-un-classification/pakistan/">Least developed countries vs Pakistan: Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 9,392 data points, 1971–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Personal remittances, received (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.