Early-demographic dividend vs Sudan: Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate

Early-demographic dividend
-2.26 % change on previous year
in 2025
Sudan
33.99 % change on previous year
in 2022
Early-demographic dividend rank
15th
Sudan rank
15th

Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Sudan
-1000100200300197119982025

How they compare

Sudan currently reports 33.99 % change on previous year against -2.26 % change on previous year in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 36.25 % change on previous year.

That makes Sudan's figure about 15.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Sudan ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Sudan ranks 15th of 47 groups.

Across the 6 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Sudan Difference Ahead
1970s 36.93 % change on previous year 77.88 % change on previous year 40.95 % change on previous year Sudan
1980s 7.05 % change on previous year 30.22 % change on previous year 23.16 % change on previous year Sudan
1990s 9.44 % change on previous year 40.09 % change on previous year 30.65 % change on previous year Sudan
2000s 13.16 % change on previous year 11.93 % change on previous year 1.22 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
2010s 6.92 % change on previous year 1.16 % change on previous year 5.76 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
2020s 9.24 % change on previous year 51.58 % change on previous year 42.34 % change on previous year Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, received (current us$), annual growth rate, Early-demographic dividend or Sudan?
Sudan, at 33.99 % change on previous year against -2.26 % change on previous year in Early-demographic dividend as of 2022.
What is the difference in personal remittances, received (current us$), annual growth rate between Early-demographic dividend and Sudan?
36.25 % change on previous year, with Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Sudan?
45 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2022.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Sudan rank globally for personal remittances, received (current us$), annual growth rate?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 15th and Sudan ranks 15th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Sudan: Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-annual-growth-rate/early-demographic-dividend/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-received-current-us-annual-growth-rate/early-demographic-dividend/sudan/">Early-demographic dividend vs Sudan: Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, received (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 9,392 data points, 1971–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Personal remittances, received (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.