Hong Kong, China vs South Africa: Personal remittances, paid

Hong Kong, China
1.09 billion current US$
in 2024
South Africa
1.13 billion current US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
55th
South Africa rank
53rd

Personal remittances, paid over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • South Africa
0500.0M1.0B1.5B197019972025

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 1.13 billion current US$ against 1.09 billion current US$ in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 39.10 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1998 it was South Africa ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 55th and South Africa ranks 53rd of 196 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 171.14 million current US$ 628.75 million current US$ 457.61 million current US$ South Africa
2000s 338.93 million current US$ 881.34 million current US$ 542.41 million current US$ South Africa
2010s 739.42 million current US$ 1.14 billion current US$ 403.71 million current US$ South Africa
2020s 953.79 million current US$ 984.95 million current US$ 31.17 million current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid, Hong Kong, China or South Africa?
South Africa, at 1.13 billion current US$ against 1.09 billion current US$ in Hong Kong, China as of 2025.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid between Hong Kong, China and South Africa?
39.10 million current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and South Africa?
27 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2024.
How do Hong Kong, China and South Africa rank globally for personal remittances, paid?
Hong Kong, China ranks 55th and South Africa ranks 53rd of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
IMF balance of payments data, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs South Africa: Personal remittances, paid. Statizoid, drawing on IMF balance of payments data, International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/south-africa/">Hong Kong, China vs South Africa: Personal remittances, paid</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
IMF balance of payments data, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
243 places, 9,677 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

Personal remittances comprise personal transfers and compensation of employees. Personal transfers consist of all current transfers in cash or in kind made or received by resident households to or from nonresident households. Personal transfers thus include all current transfers between resident and nonresident individuals. Compensation of employees refers to the income of border, seasonal, and other short-term workers who are employed in an economy where they are not resident and of residents employed by nonresident entities. Data are the sum of two items defined in the sixth edition of the IMF's Balance of Payments Manual: personal transfers and compensation of employees. Data are in current U.S. dollars.