Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Macau, China: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per unit of GDP

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Macau, China
0.0496 current US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank
18th
Macau, China rank
19th

Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
  • Macau, China
00.020.040.060.08199320092025

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 0.0496 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0463 current US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 14.9 times Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 18th and Macau, China ranks 19th of 47 groups.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) Macau, China Difference Ahead
2000s 0.004 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0266 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0226 current US$ per US$ of GDP Macau, China
2010s 0.0051 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0331 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.028 current US$ per US$ of GDP Macau, China
2020s 0.0048 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0674 current US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0626 current US$ per US$ of GDP Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid (current us$), per unit of gdp, Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 0.0496 current US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0033 current US$ per US$ of GDP in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) as of 2024.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid (current us$), per unit of gdp between Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Macau, China?
0.0463 current US$ per US$ of GDP, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Macau, China?
23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
How do Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) and Macau, China rank globally for personal remittances, paid (current us$), per unit of gdp?
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 18th and Macau, China ranks 19th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Macau, China: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-unit-of-gdp/europe-and-central-asia-excluding-high-income/macao-sar-china/">Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) vs Macau, China: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
current US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
242 places, 9,632 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, paid (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.