Naoero vs OECD members: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre

Naoero
961,355 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
9,959 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero rank
10th
OECD members rank
8th

Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Naoero
  • OECD members
0500.0k1.0M1.5M196619942023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 961,355 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,959 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 951,396 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Naoero's figure about 96.5 times OECD members's.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Naoero has been ahead every year.

Naoero ranks 10th and OECD members ranks 8th of 194 countries.

Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Naoero OECD members Difference Ahead
2000s 104,181 current US$ per square kilometre 5,580 current US$ per square kilometre 98,601 current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2010s 677,843 current US$ per square kilometre 6,337 current US$ per square kilometre 671,506 current US$ per square kilometre Naoero
2020s 818,901 current US$ per square kilometre 8,641 current US$ per square kilometre 810,261 current US$ per square kilometre Naoero

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre, Naoero or OECD members?
Naoero, at 961,355 current US$ per square kilometre against 9,959 current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre between Naoero and OECD members?
951,396 current US$ per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and OECD members?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Naoero and OECD members rank globally for personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre?
Naoero ranks 10th and OECD members ranks 8th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Naoero vs OECD members: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/naoero/oecd-members/">Naoero vs OECD members: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,204 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, paid (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.