Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre

Namibia
70.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
86.01 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
187th
Zimbabwe rank
184th

Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Namibia
  • Zimbabwe
0100200300197720002023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 86.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 70.14 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 15.87 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 187th and Zimbabwe ranks 184th of 194 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 21.85 current US$ per square kilometre 19.84 current US$ per square kilometre 2.01 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2000s 82.34 current US$ per square kilometre 22.13 current US$ per square kilometre 60.21 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 103.81 current US$ per square kilometre 35.18 current US$ per square kilometre 68.64 current US$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 65.32 current US$ per square kilometre 67.2 current US$ per square kilometre 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 86.01 current US$ per square kilometre against 70.14 current US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
15.87 current US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
20 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre?
Namibia ranks 187th and Zimbabwe ranks 184th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/zimbabwe/">Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,204 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, paid (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.