Mauritius vs North America: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre

Mauritius
680,316 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
North America
6,251 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
14th
North America rank
12th

Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • North America
0200.0k400.0k600.0k197019962023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 680,316 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,251 current US$ per square kilometre in North America, a difference of 674,065 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 108.8 times North America's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 14th and North America ranks 12th of 194 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 5 and North America in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius North America Difference Ahead
1970s 558.9 current US$ per square kilometre 56.55 current US$ per square kilometre 502.35 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 563.65 current US$ per square kilometre 362.39 current US$ per square kilometre 201.27 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 497.02 current US$ per square kilometre 1,248 current US$ per square kilometre 750.94 current US$ per square kilometre North America
2000s 4,662 current US$ per square kilometre 2,769 current US$ per square kilometre 1,893 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 204,577 current US$ per square kilometre 3,619 current US$ per square kilometre 200,957 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 638,140 current US$ per square kilometre 5,107 current US$ per square kilometre 633,033 current US$ per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre, Mauritius or North America?
Mauritius, at 680,316 current US$ per square kilometre against 6,251 current US$ per square kilometre in North America as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre between Mauritius and North America?
674,065 current US$ per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and North America?
47 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and North America rank globally for personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 14th and North America ranks 12th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs North America: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/north-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/north-america/">Mauritius vs North America: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,204 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, paid (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.