Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
920,712 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Naoero
961,355 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
12th
Naoero rank
10th

Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Naoero
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M199820102023

How they compare

Naoero currently reports 961,355 current US$ per square kilometre against 920,712 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 40,643 current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 12th and Naoero ranks 10th of 194 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Naoero Difference Ahead
2000s 384,016 current US$ per square kilometre 104,181 current US$ per square kilometre 279,835 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 704,206 current US$ per square kilometre 677,843 current US$ per square kilometre 26,363 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 876,591 current US$ per square kilometre 818,901 current US$ per square kilometre 57,690 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Naoero?
Naoero, at 961,355 current US$ per square kilometre against 920,712 current US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Naoero?
40,643 current US$ per square kilometre, with Naoero ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Naoero?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Naoero rank globally for personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 12th and Naoero ranks 10th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/naoero/">Hong Kong, China vs Naoero: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,204 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, paid (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.