Europe & Central Asia vs Hong Kong, China: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre

Europe & Central Asia
8,073 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
920,712 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Europe & Central Asia rank
11th
Hong Kong, China rank
12th

Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Europe & Central Asia
  • Hong Kong, China
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M197019962023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 920,712 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,073 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia, a difference of 912,639 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 114.0 times Europe & Central Asia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Europe & Central Asia ranks 11th and Hong Kong, China ranks 12th of 47 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe & Central Asia Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 1,501 current US$ per square kilometre 162,986 current US$ per square kilometre 161,486 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 3,258 current US$ per square kilometre 322,791 current US$ per square kilometre 319,533 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 6,107 current US$ per square kilometre 704,206 current US$ per square kilometre 698,098 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 7,457 current US$ per square kilometre 876,591 current US$ per square kilometre 869,134 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre, Europe & Central Asia or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 920,712 current US$ per square kilometre against 8,073 current US$ per square kilometre in Europe & Central Asia as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre between Europe & Central Asia and Hong Kong, China?
912,639 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe & Central Asia and Hong Kong, China?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Europe & Central Asia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre?
Europe & Central Asia ranks 11th and Hong Kong, China ranks 12th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe & Central Asia vs Hong Kong, China: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/europe-and-central-asia/hong-kong-sar-china/">Europe & Central Asia vs Hong Kong, China: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,204 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, paid (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.