East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2,722 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
135,922 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2018
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
20th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
23rd

Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
050.0k100.0k150.0k197119972023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 135,922 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,722 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 133,200 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 49.9 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Turks and Caicos Islands has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 20th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 23rd of 47 groups.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 135,922 current US$ per square kilometre against 2,722 current US$ per square kilometre in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2018.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
133,200 current US$ per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Turks and Caicos Islands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 20th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 23rd of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/turks-and-caicos-islands/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,204 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, paid (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.