Czechia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre

Czechia
70,416 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
482.81 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
36th
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
39th

Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Czechia
  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k197119972023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 70,416 current US$ per square kilometre against 482.81 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 69,933 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 145.8 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 36th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th of 194 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Difference Ahead
1990s 4,024 current US$ per square kilometre 56.6 current US$ per square kilometre 3,967 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 18,188 current US$ per square kilometre 110.05 current US$ per square kilometre 18,078 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 28,589 current US$ per square kilometre 306.75 current US$ per square kilometre 28,282 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 68,376 current US$ per square kilometre 414.45 current US$ per square kilometre 67,961 current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre, Czechia or Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
Czechia, at 70,416 current US$ per square kilometre against 482.81 current US$ per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre between Czechia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
69,933 current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank globally for personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre?
Czechia ranks 36th and Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/">Czechia vs Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,204 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, paid (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.