Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre

Aruba
644,744 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China
920,712 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
15th
Hong Kong, China rank
12th

Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Hong Kong, China
0200.0k400.0k600.0k800.0k1.0M199120072023

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 920,712 current US$ per square kilometre against 644,744 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba, a difference of 275,968 current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.4 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Aruba ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 12th of 194 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1990s 108,365 current US$ per square kilometre 162,986 current US$ per square kilometre 54,622 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2000s 322,776 current US$ per square kilometre 322,791 current US$ per square kilometre 15.7 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2010s 514,394 current US$ per square kilometre 704,206 current US$ per square kilometre 189,811 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China
2020s 610,430 current US$ per square kilometre 876,591 current US$ per square kilometre 266,160 current US$ per square kilometre Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre, Aruba or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 920,712 current US$ per square kilometre against 644,744 current US$ per square kilometre in Aruba as of 2023.
What is the difference in personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre between Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
275,968 current US$ per square kilometre, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Hong Kong, China?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Hong Kong, China rank globally for personal remittances, paid (current us$), per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 15th and Hong Kong, China ranks 12th of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/personal-remittances-paid-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/hong-kong-sar-china/">Aruba vs Hong Kong, China: Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Personal remittances, paid (current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
241 places, 9,204 data points, 1966–2023
Last refreshed

Personal remittances, paid (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.