Czechia vs Iceland: Perceived health status by socio-economic status
Perceived health status by socio-economic status over time
- Czechia
- Iceland
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 64.3 Percentage of population in the same age against 61.6 Percentage of population in the same age in Iceland, a difference of 2.7 Percentage of population in the same age.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 7th and Iceland ranks 8th of 26 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.12 Percentage of population in the same age | 72.96 Percentage of population in the same age | 25.84 Percentage of population in the same age | Iceland |
| 2010s | 42.7 Percentage of population in the same age | 67.2 Percentage of population in the same age | 24.5 Percentage of population in the same age | Iceland |
| 2020s | 41 Percentage of population in the same age | 61.6 Percentage of population in the same age | 20.6 Percentage of population in the same age | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher perceived health status by socio-economic status, Czechia or Iceland?
- Czechia, at 64.3 Percentage of population in the same age against 61.6 Percentage of population in the same age in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in perceived health status by socio-economic status between Czechia and Iceland?
- 2.7 Percentage of population in the same age, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Iceland?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
- How do Czechia and Iceland rank globally for perceived health status by socio-economic status?
- Czechia ranks 7th and Iceland ranks 8th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Perceived health status by socio-economic status. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset presents data on perceived health status by income quintile (the proportion of persons aged 15 years old and over within the highest and lowest income quintiles who report their health to be ‘good/very good’). Quintile 1 (Lowest 20% of income group) and Quintile 5 (Highest 20% of income group) are taken into account. This dataset also includes data on perceived health status by education level (proportion of persons aged 15 years old and over by level of education who report their health to be “good” or “better”.) The following education levels are taken into account: Low education (ISCED 0 to 2), Medium education (ISCED 3 and 4), and High education (ISCED 5 to 8). Please refer to the Sources and Methods for detailed country-specific information.