Grenada vs Libya: Milk supply per person
Grenada
149.11 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Libya
141.74 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Grenada rank
61st
Libya rank
64th
Milk supply per person over time
- Grenada
- Libya
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 149.11 kilograms per year per capita against 141.74 kilograms per year per capita in Libya, a difference of 7.37 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Grenada ranks 61st and Libya ranks 64th of 191 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 110.36 kilograms per year per capita | 129.38 kilograms per year per capita | 19.03 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
| 2020s | 140.16 kilograms per year per capita | 143.48 kilograms per year per capita | 3.32 kilograms per year per capita | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher milk supply per person, Grenada or Libya?
- Grenada, at 149.11 kilograms per year per capita against 141.74 kilograms per year per capita in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in milk supply per person between Grenada and Libya?
- 7.37 kilograms per year per capita, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Libya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Libya rank globally for milk supply per person?
- Grenada ranks 61st and Libya ranks 64th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Milk supply per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.