Bhutan vs Djibouti: Milk supply per person
Bhutan
63.52 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Djibouti
61.12 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bhutan rank
115th
Djibouti rank
118th
Milk supply per person over time
- Bhutan
- Djibouti
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 63.52 kilograms per year per capita against 61.12 kilograms per year per capita in Djibouti, a difference of 2.4 kilograms per year per capita.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 115th and Djibouti ranks 118th of 192 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 111.02 kilograms per year per capita | 53.98 kilograms per year per capita | 57.04 kilograms per year per capita | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 86.95 kilograms per year per capita | 65.72 kilograms per year per capita | 21.23 kilograms per year per capita | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher milk supply per person, Bhutan or Djibouti?
- Bhutan, at 63.52 kilograms per year per capita against 61.12 kilograms per year per capita in Djibouti as of 2023.
- What is the difference in milk supply per person between Bhutan and Djibouti?
- 2.4 kilograms per year per capita, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Djibouti?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bhutan and Djibouti rank globally for milk supply per person?
- Bhutan ranks 115th and Djibouti ranks 118th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Milk supply per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.