Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Per capita egg consumption

Sao Tome and Principe
0.71 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Uganda
0.75 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe rank
177th
Uganda rank
175th

Per capita egg consumption over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Uganda
0.511.522.53196119922023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.75 kilograms per year per capita against 0.71 kilograms per year per capita in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.04 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 175th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 6 and Uganda in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Uganda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9001 kilograms per year per capita 0.5782 kilograms per year per capita 0.3219 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 1.07 kilograms per year per capita 0.6483 kilograms per year per capita 0.4212 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 1.12 kilograms per year per capita 0.6332 kilograms per year per capita 0.4885 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 1.6 kilograms per year per capita 0.6375 kilograms per year per capita 0.9595 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 2.63 kilograms per year per capita 0.6526 kilograms per year per capita 1.98 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.92 kilograms per year per capita 0.941 kilograms per year per capita 0.9799 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.735 kilograms per year per capita 0.7675 kilograms per year per capita 0.0325 kilograms per year per capita Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita egg consumption, Sao Tome and Principe or Uganda?
Uganda, at 0.75 kilograms per year per capita against 0.71 kilograms per year per capita in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita egg consumption between Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda?
0.04 kilograms per year per capita, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Uganda rank globally for per capita egg consumption?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th and Uganda ranks 175th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita egg consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Per capita egg consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-egg-consumption-kilograms-per-year/sao-tome-and-principe/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-egg-consumption-kilograms-per-year/sao-tome-and-principe/uganda/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Uganda: Per capita egg consumption</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita egg consumption
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.