Lesotho vs Sao Tome and Principe: Per capita egg consumption

Lesotho
0.55 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
0.71 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Lesotho rank
179th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
177th

Per capita egg consumption over time

  • Lesotho
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0123196119922023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 0.71 kilograms per year per capita against 0.55 kilograms per year per capita in Lesotho, a difference of 0.16 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.3 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lesotho ahead.

Lesotho ranks 179th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.988 kilograms per year per capita 0.9001 kilograms per year per capita 0.0879 kilograms per year per capita Lesotho
1970s 0.9358 kilograms per year per capita 1.07 kilograms per year per capita 0.1337 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.6179 kilograms per year per capita 1.12 kilograms per year per capita 0.5038 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.534 kilograms per year per capita 1.6 kilograms per year per capita 1.06 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 0.7247 kilograms per year per capita 2.63 kilograms per year per capita 1.91 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 0.831 kilograms per year per capita 1.92 kilograms per year per capita 1.09 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0.5775 kilograms per year per capita 0.735 kilograms per year per capita 0.1575 kilograms per year per capita Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher per capita egg consumption, Lesotho or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 0.71 kilograms per year per capita against 0.55 kilograms per year per capita in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in per capita egg consumption between Lesotho and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.16 kilograms per year per capita, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lesotho and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for per capita egg consumption?
Lesotho ranks 179th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 177th of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita egg consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Sao Tome and Principe: Per capita egg consumption. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-egg-consumption-kilograms-per-year/lesotho/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/per-capita-egg-consumption-kilograms-per-year/lesotho/sao-tome-and-principe/">Lesotho vs Sao Tome and Principe: Per capita egg consumption</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Per capita egg consumption
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,214 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.