Comoros vs Eswatini: Per capita egg consumption
Comoros
1.48 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Eswatini
1.43 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Comoros rank
158th
Eswatini rank
160th
Per capita egg consumption over time
- Comoros
- Eswatini
How they compare
Comoros currently reports 1.48 kilograms per year per capita against 1.43 kilograms per year per capita in Eswatini, a difference of 0.05 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Eswatini ahead.
Comoros ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 160th of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.57 kilograms per year per capita | 1.67 kilograms per year per capita | 0.099 kilograms per year per capita | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1.81 kilograms per year per capita | 1.55 kilograms per year per capita | 0.26 kilograms per year per capita | Comoros |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita egg consumption, Comoros or Eswatini?
- Comoros, at 1.48 kilograms per year per capita against 1.43 kilograms per year per capita in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita egg consumption between Comoros and Eswatini?
- 0.05 kilograms per year per capita, with Comoros ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Eswatini?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Eswatini rank globally for per capita egg consumption?
- Comoros ranks 158th and Eswatini ranks 160th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita egg consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.