Bangladesh vs Tonga: Per capita egg consumption
Bangladesh
3.77 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Tonga
3.69 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
131st
Tonga rank
133rd
Per capita egg consumption over time
- Bangladesh
- Tonga
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 3.77 kilograms per year per capita against 3.69 kilograms per year per capita in Tonga, a difference of 0.08 kilograms per year per capita.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Tonga ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 131st and Tonga ranks 133rd of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.74 kilograms per year per capita | 3.65 kilograms per year per capita | 0.9094 kilograms per year per capita | Tonga |
| 2020s | 3.83 kilograms per year per capita | 3.7 kilograms per year per capita | 0.1305 kilograms per year per capita | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher per capita egg consumption, Bangladesh or Tonga?
- Bangladesh, at 3.77 kilograms per year per capita against 3.69 kilograms per year per capita in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in per capita egg consumption between Bangladesh and Tonga?
- 0.08 kilograms per year per capita, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Tonga?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2023.
- How do Bangladesh and Tonga rank globally for per capita egg consumption?
- Bangladesh ranks 131st and Tonga ranks 133rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Per capita egg consumption. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.