Eswatini vs Namibia: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6)

Eswatini
3.13 million US dollar
in 2025
Namibia
911,265 US dollar
in 2025
Eswatini rank
77th
Namibia rank
80th

Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Namibia
050.0M100.0M150.0M198120032025

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 3.13 million US dollar against 911,265 US dollar in Namibia, a difference of 2.22 million US dollar.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 3.4 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Namibia ahead.

Eswatini ranks 77th and Namibia ranks 80th of 125 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 78,001 US dollar 0 US dollar 78,001 US dollar Eswatini
2020s 567,220 US dollar 859,333 US dollar 292,113 US dollar Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6), Eswatini or Namibia?
Eswatini, at 3.13 million US dollar against 911,265 US dollar in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6) between Eswatini and Namibia?
2.22 million US dollar, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Namibia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
How do Eswatini and Namibia rank globally for other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6)?
Eswatini ranks 77th and Namibia ranks 80th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Namibia: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-other-accounts-receivable-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets-positions/eswatini/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-other-accounts-receivable-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets-positions/eswatini/namibia/">Eswatini vs Namibia: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
127 places, 2,299 data points, 1975–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.