Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6)

Croatia
57.14 million US dollar
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
109.72 million US dollar
in 2024
Croatia rank
50th
Guinea-Bissau rank
47th

Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6) over time

  • Croatia
  • Guinea-Bissau
025.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M199920112024

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 109.72 million US dollar against 57.14 million US dollar in Croatia, a difference of 52.58 million US dollar.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.9 times Croatia's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 50th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 47th of 125 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 0 US dollar 153,841 US dollar 153,841 US dollar Guinea-Bissau
2010s 0 US dollar 14.38 million US dollar 14.38 million US dollar Guinea-Bissau
2020s 22.26 million US dollar 88.60 million US dollar 66.34 million US dollar Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6), Croatia or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 109.72 million US dollar against 57.14 million US dollar in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6) between Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
52.58 million US dollar, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
13 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6)?
Croatia ranks 50th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 47th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-other-accounts-receivable-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets-positions/croatia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-other-accounts-receivable-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets-positions/croatia/guinea-bissau/">Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
127 places, 2,299 data points, 1975–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.