Belarus vs Guinea-Bissau: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6)

Belarus
102.05 million US dollar
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
109.72 million US dollar
in 2024
Belarus rank
48th
Guinea-Bissau rank
47th

Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6) over time

  • Belarus
  • Guinea-Bissau
050.0M100.0M150.0M199620102025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 109.72 million US dollar against 102.05 million US dollar in Belarus, a difference of 7.67 million US dollar.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Belarus ranks 48th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 47th of 125 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
2000s 0 US dollar 293,146 US dollar 293,146 US dollar Guinea-Bissau
2010s 60.03 million US dollar 14.38 million US dollar 45.65 million US dollar Belarus
2020s 100.66 million US dollar 88.60 million US dollar 12.07 million US dollar Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6), Belarus or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 109.72 million US dollar against 102.05 million US dollar in Belarus as of 2024.
What is the difference in other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6) between Belarus and Guinea-Bissau?
7.67 million US dollar, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guinea-Bissau?
12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Belarus and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6)?
Belarus ranks 48th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 47th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Guinea-Bissau: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-other-accounts-receivable-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets-positions/belarus/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-other-accounts-receivable-other-sectors-bpm6-short-term-assets-positions/belarus/guinea-bissau/">Belarus vs Guinea-Bissau: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6), Short-term (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
127 places, 2,299 data points, 1975–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.