Latvia vs Namibia: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6)

Latvia
319.60 million US dollar
in 2025
Namibia
471.96 million US dollar
in 2025
Latvia rank
51st
Namibia rank
48th

Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6) over time

  • Latvia
  • Namibia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B2.5B198920072025

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 471.96 million US dollar against 319.60 million US dollar in Latvia, a difference of 152.36 million US dollar.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.5 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Latvia ranks 51st and Namibia ranks 48th of 137 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 13.10 million US dollar 1.96 billion US dollar 1.95 billion US dollar Namibia
2000s 66.80 million US dollar 148.08 million US dollar 81.27 million US dollar Namibia
2010s 117.35 million US dollar 262.98 million US dollar 145.63 million US dollar Namibia
2020s 268.74 million US dollar 278.14 million US dollar 9.40 million US dollar Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6), Latvia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 471.96 million US dollar against 319.60 million US dollar in Latvia as of 2025.
What is the difference in other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6) between Latvia and Namibia?
152.36 million US dollar, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
20 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for other investment, other accounts receivable, other sectors (bpm6)?
Latvia ranks 51st and Namibia ranks 48th of 137 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6) (Assets, Positions, US dollar). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Namibia: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6). Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-other-accounts-receivable-other-sectors-bpm6-assets-positions-us-dollar/latvia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-other-accounts-receivable-other-sectors-bpm6-assets-positions-us-dollar/latvia/namibia/">Latvia vs Namibia: Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Other accounts receivable, Other Sectors (BPM6) (Assets, Positions, US dollar)
Unit
US dollar
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
140 places, 2,964 data points, 1948–2025
Last refreshed

The International Investment Position (IIP) is a statistical statement that shows at a point in time the value of financial assets of residents of an economy that are claims on nonresidents or are gold bullion held as reserve assets; and the liabilities of residents of an economy to nonresidents.