Hong Kong vs Malta: Other investment, Currency and deposits (Assets) … square kilometre

Hong Kong
1.11 billion US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
99.39 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong rank
2nd
Malta rank
5th

Other investment, Currency and deposits (Assets) … square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong
  • Malta
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199420082023

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 1.11 billion US dollar per square kilometre against 99.39 million US dollar per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 1.01 billion US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 11.2 times Malta's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Hong Kong has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 5th of 169 countries.

Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong Malta Difference Ahead
2000s 408.20 million US dollar per square kilometre 15.51 million US dollar per square kilometre 392.69 million US dollar per square kilometre Hong Kong
2010s 687.35 million US dollar per square kilometre 48.33 million US dollar per square kilometre 639.02 million US dollar per square kilometre Hong Kong
2020s 1.02 billion US dollar per square kilometre 105.25 million US dollar per square kilometre 914.84 million US dollar per square kilometre Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment, currency and deposits (assets, positions, us), Hong Kong or Malta?
Hong Kong, at 1.11 billion US dollar per square kilometre against 99.39 million US dollar per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in other investment, currency and deposits (assets, positions, us) between Hong Kong and Malta?
1.01 billion US dollar per square kilometre, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Malta?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong and Malta rank globally for other investment, currency and deposits (assets, positions, us)?
Hong Kong ranks 2nd and Malta ranks 5th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other investment, Currency and deposits (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Malta: Other investment, Currency and deposits (Assets, Positions, US). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-currency-and-deposits-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-currency-and-deposits-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/malta/">Hong Kong vs Malta: Other investment, Currency and deposits (Assets, Positions, US)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment, Currency and deposits (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 3,932 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other investment, Currency and deposits (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.