New Zealand vs East Timor: Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre

New Zealand
100,773 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor
97,773 US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
88th
East Timor rank
89th

Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre over time

  • New Zealand
  • East Timor
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k200020112023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 100,773 US dollar per square kilometre against 97,773 US dollar per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 3,000 US dollar per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was New Zealand ahead.

New Zealand ranks 88th and East Timor ranks 89th of 169 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand East Timor Difference Ahead
2000s 61,002 US dollar per square kilometre 13,071 US dollar per square kilometre 47,931 US dollar per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 98,216 US dollar per square kilometre 41,872 US dollar per square kilometre 56,344 US dollar per square kilometre New Zealand
2020s 99,715 US dollar per square kilometre 86,678 US dollar per square kilometre 13,037 US dollar per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre, New Zealand or East Timor?
New Zealand, at 100,773 US dollar per square kilometre against 97,773 US dollar per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in other investment (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre between New Zealand and East Timor?
3,000 US dollar per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and East Timor?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and East Timor rank globally for other investment (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre?
New Zealand ranks 88th and East Timor ranks 89th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs East Timor: Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/timor-leste/">New Zealand vs East Timor: Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 4,079 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.