Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre

Mauritius
32.08 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
United Kingdom
27.13 million US dollar per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius rank
9th
United Kingdom rank
11th

Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre over time

  • Mauritius
  • United Kingdom
010.0M20.0M30.0M198020012023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 32.08 million US dollar per square kilometre against 27.13 million US dollar per square kilometre in United Kingdom, a difference of 4.95 million US dollar per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.2 times United Kingdom's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 43 shared years of data; in 1981 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Mauritius ranks 9th and United Kingdom ranks 11th of 169 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and United Kingdom in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1980s 32,774 US dollar per square kilometre 2.70 million US dollar per square kilometre 2.66 million US dollar per square kilometre United Kingdom
1990s 122,390 US dollar per square kilometre 5.53 million US dollar per square kilometre 5.40 million US dollar per square kilometre United Kingdom
2000s 2.08 million US dollar per square kilometre 18.62 million US dollar per square kilometre 16.54 million US dollar per square kilometre United Kingdom
2010s 25.46 million US dollar per square kilometre 23.84 million US dollar per square kilometre 1.62 million US dollar per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 30.37 million US dollar per square kilometre 26.87 million US dollar per square kilometre 3.50 million US dollar per square kilometre Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher other investment (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre, Mauritius or United Kingdom?
Mauritius, at 32.08 million US dollar per square kilometre against 27.13 million US dollar per square kilometre in United Kingdom as of 2023.
What is the difference in other investment (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre between Mauritius and United Kingdom?
4.95 million US dollar per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and United Kingdom?
43 years are reported by both, from 1981 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and United Kingdom rank globally for other investment (assets, positions, us dollar), per square kilometre?
Mauritius ranks 9th and United Kingdom ranks 11th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/other-investment-assets-positions-us-dollar-per-square-kilometre/mauritius/united-kingdom/">Mauritius vs United Kingdom: Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar), per square kilometre
Unit
US dollar per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
169 places, 4,079 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Other investment (Assets, Positions, US dollar) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.