Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in

Lithuania
0.0244
in 2100
Sub-Saharan Africa
0.0863
in 2100
Lithuania rank
7th
Sub-Saharan Africa rank
5th

OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in over time

  • Lithuania
  • Sub-Saharan Africa
00.10.20.3199020452100

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa currently reports 0.0863 against 0.0244 in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0619.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa's figure about 3.5 times Lithuania's.

Across all 110 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa has been ahead every year.

Lithuania ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 14 countries.

Sub-Saharan Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Sub-Saharan Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0298 0.2636 0.2338 Sub-Saharan Africa
2000s 0.019 0.2533 0.2343 Sub-Saharan Africa
2010s 0.0338 0.2101 0.1763 Sub-Saharan Africa
2020s 0.0225 0.1646 0.1422 Sub-Saharan Africa
2030s 0.0228 0.1479 0.1252 Sub-Saharan Africa
2040s 0.0238 0.1354 0.1116 Sub-Saharan Africa
2050s 0.0242 0.1238 0.0997 Sub-Saharan Africa
2060s 0.0243 0.1139 0.0896 Sub-Saharan Africa
2070s 0.0243 0.1054 0.0811 Sub-Saharan Africa
2080s 0.0244 0.0976 0.0732 Sub-Saharan Africa
2090s 0.0244 0.0899 0.0655 Sub-Saharan Africa
2100s 0.0244 0.0863 0.062 Sub-Saharan Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oecd economic outlook 117 long-term scenarios — share of coal in, Lithuania or Sub-Saharan Africa?
Sub-Saharan Africa, at 0.0863 against 0.0244 in Lithuania as of 2100.
What is the difference in oecd economic outlook 117 long-term scenarios — share of coal in between Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
0.0619, with Sub-Saharan Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa?
110 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2100.
How do Lithuania and Sub-Saharan Africa rank globally for oecd economic outlook 117 long-term scenarios — share of coal in?
Lithuania ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa ranks 5th of 14 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in total primary energy supply, fraction between 0 and 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/oecd-economic-outlook-117-long-term-scenarios-share-of-coal-in-total-primary-energy/lithuania-2/sub-saharan-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/oecd-economic-outlook-117-long-term-scenarios-share-of-coal-in-total-primary-energy/lithuania-2/sub-saharan-africa/">Lithuania vs Sub-Saharan Africa: OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in total primary energy supply, fraction between 0 and 1
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
64 places, 7,053 data points, 1990–2100
Last refreshed

Long-run economic scenarios (to 2100) are produced every 2-3 years to look at factors influencing the global economy that play out over many decades. Different vintages look at a different set of scenarios described in an associated publication. Selected series from these scenarios are available here for individual OECD, accession and G20 economies. A breakdown of the global economy by regions (following World Bank definitions) is also provided.