Lithuania vs Middle East and North Africa: OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in

Lithuania
0.0244
in 2100
Middle East and North Africa
0.0129
in 2100
Lithuania rank
7th
Middle East and North Africa rank
7th

OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in over time

  • Lithuania
  • Middle East and North Africa
0.010.020.030.040.05199020452100

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 0.0244 against 0.0129 in Middle East and North Africa, a difference of 0.0115.

That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.9 times Middle East and North Africa's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 111 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Lithuania ahead.

Lithuania ranks 7th and Middle East and North Africa ranks 7th of 14 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 11 and Middle East and North Africa in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Middle East and North Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0315 0.0209 0.0106 Lithuania
2000s 0.019 0.0227 0.0037 Middle East and North Africa
2010s 0.0338 0.0163 0.0175 Lithuania
2020s 0.0225 0.0151 0.0074 Lithuania
2030s 0.0228 0.0143 0.0085 Lithuania
2040s 0.0238 0.0146 0.0092 Lithuania
2050s 0.0242 0.0146 0.0096 Lithuania
2060s 0.0243 0.0145 0.0098 Lithuania
2070s 0.0243 0.0142 0.0101 Lithuania
2080s 0.0244 0.0138 0.0106 Lithuania
2090s 0.0244 0.0131 0.0112 Lithuania
2100s 0.0244 0.0129 0.0114 Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oecd economic outlook 117 long-term scenarios — share of coal in, Lithuania or Middle East and North Africa?
Lithuania, at 0.0244 against 0.0129 in Middle East and North Africa as of 2100.
What is the difference in oecd economic outlook 117 long-term scenarios — share of coal in between Lithuania and Middle East and North Africa?
0.0115, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Middle East and North Africa?
111 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2100.
How do Lithuania and Middle East and North Africa rank globally for oecd economic outlook 117 long-term scenarios — share of coal in?
Lithuania ranks 7th and Middle East and North Africa ranks 7th of 14 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in total primary energy supply, fraction between 0 and 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Middle East and North Africa: OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/oecd-economic-outlook-117-long-term-scenarios-share-of-coal-in-total-primary-energy/lithuania-2/middle-east-and-north-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/oecd-economic-outlook-117-long-term-scenarios-share-of-coal-in-total-primary-energy/lithuania-2/middle-east-and-north-africa/">Lithuania vs Middle East and North Africa: OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in total primary energy supply, fraction between 0 and 1
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
64 places, 7,053 data points, 1990–2100
Last refreshed

Long-run economic scenarios (to 2100) are produced every 2-3 years to look at factors influencing the global economy that play out over many decades. Different vintages look at a different set of scenarios described in an associated publication. Selected series from these scenarios are available here for individual OECD, accession and G20 economies. A breakdown of the global economy by regions (following World Bank definitions) is also provided.