Croatia vs G20 advanced economies: OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in

Croatia
0
in 2100
G20 advanced economies
0.026
in 2100
Croatia rank
8th
G20 advanced economies rank
6th

OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in over time

  • Croatia
  • G20 advanced economies
00.050.10.150.20.25199020452100

How they compare

G20 advanced economies currently reports 0.026 against 0 in Croatia, a difference of 0.026.

Across all 111 years both countries report, G20 advanced economies has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 8th and G20 advanced economies ranks 6th of 10 countries.

G20 advanced economies has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia G20 advanced economies Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0416 0.2123 0.1707 G20 advanced economies
2000s 0.0666 0.2118 0.1452 G20 advanced economies
2010s 0.0711 0.1831 0.1119 G20 advanced economies
2020s 0.0414 0.1141 0.0727 G20 advanced economies
2030s 0.0245 0.0674 0.0429 G20 advanced economies
2040s 0.0086 0.0566 0.048 G20 advanced economies
2050s 0 0.0495 0.0495 G20 advanced economies
2060s 0 0.0419 0.0419 G20 advanced economies
2070s 0 0.0361 0.0361 G20 advanced economies
2080s 0 0.0315 0.0315 G20 advanced economies
2090s 0 0.0276 0.0276 G20 advanced economies
2100s 0 0.026 0.026 G20 advanced economies

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher oecd economic outlook 117 long-term scenarios — share of coal in, Croatia or G20 advanced economies?
G20 advanced economies, at 0.026 against 0 in Croatia as of 2100.
What is the difference in oecd economic outlook 117 long-term scenarios — share of coal in between Croatia and G20 advanced economies?
0.026, with G20 advanced economies ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and G20 advanced economies?
111 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2100.
How do Croatia and G20 advanced economies rank globally for oecd economic outlook 117 long-term scenarios — share of coal in?
Croatia ranks 8th and G20 advanced economies ranks 6th of 10 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in total primary energy supply, fraction between 0 and 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs G20 advanced economies: OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/oecd-economic-outlook-117-long-term-scenarios-share-of-coal-in-total-primary-energy/croatia-2/g20-advanced-economies/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/oecd-economic-outlook-117-long-term-scenarios-share-of-coal-in-total-primary-energy/croatia-2/g20-advanced-economies/">Croatia vs G20 advanced economies: OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
OECD Economic Outlook 117 long-term scenarios — Share of coal in total primary energy supply, fraction between 0 and 1
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
64 places, 7,053 data points, 1990–2100
Last refreshed

Long-run economic scenarios (to 2100) are produced every 2-3 years to look at factors influencing the global economy that play out over many decades. Different vintages look at a different set of scenarios described in an associated publication. Selected series from these scenarios are available here for individual OECD, accession and G20 economies. A breakdown of the global economy by regions (following World Bank definitions) is also provided.