Bangladesh vs Upper-middle-income economies: Number of people unable to afford a healthy diet (NUA) — Value — July

Bangladesh
67.8 million No
in 2025
Upper-middle-income economies
636.7 million No
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
9th
Upper-middle-income economies rank
9th

Number of people unable to afford a healthy diet (NUA) — Value — July over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Upper-middle-income economies
02004006008001.0k201720212025

How they compare

Upper-middle-income economies currently reports 636.7 million No against 67.8 million No in Bangladesh, a difference of 568.9 million No.

That makes Upper-middle-income economies's figure about 9.4 times Bangladesh's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Upper-middle-income economies has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 9th and Upper-middle-income economies ranks 9th of 159 countries.

Upper-middle-income economies has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Upper-middle-income economies Difference Ahead
2010s 96.07 million No 871.93 million No 775.87 million No Upper-middle-income economies
2020s 74.57 million No 733.13 million No 658.57 million No Upper-middle-income economies

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher number of people unable to afford a healthy diet (nua) — value — july, Bangladesh or Upper-middle-income economies?
Upper-middle-income economies, at 636.7 million No against 67.8 million No in Bangladesh as of 2025.
What is the difference in number of people unable to afford a healthy diet (nua) — value — july between Bangladesh and Upper-middle-income economies?
568.9 million No, with Upper-middle-income economies ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Upper-middle-income economies?
9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
How do Bangladesh and Upper-middle-income economies rank globally for number of people unable to afford a healthy diet (nua) — value — july?
Bangladesh ranks 9th and Upper-middle-income economies ranks 9th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Number of people unable to afford a healthy diet (NUA) — Value — July 2026 (SOFI report). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Upper-middle-income economies: Number of people unable to afford a healthy diet (NUA) — Value — July. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-people-unable-to-afford-a-healthy-diet-nua-value-july-2026-sofi-report/bangladesh/upper-middle-income-economies/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/number-of-people-unable-to-afford-a-healthy-diet-nua-value-july-2026-sofi-report/bangladesh/upper-middle-income-economies/">Bangladesh vs Upper-middle-income economies: Number of people unable to afford a healthy diet (NUA) — Value — July</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Number of people unable to afford a healthy diet (NUA) — Value — July 2026 (SOFI report)
Unit
million No
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
193 places, 1,735 data points, 2017–2025
Last refreshed

Indicators on the cost and affordability of a healthy diet (CoAHD) are estimated in each country and show the population’s physical and economic access to least expensive locally available foods to meet requirements for a healthy diet, as defined in food-based dietary guidelines (FBDGs). The indicators use observed retail food consumer prices and income distributions to provide an operational measure of people’s access to locally available foods in the proportions needed for health. These indicators support efforts within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to end hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture by 2030 (SDG 2). They also support the monitoring of progress towards the objective of transforming agrifood systems by promoting “nutrition-sensitive agriculture”. FAO, in partnership with the Food Price for Nutrition of the World Bank, produces and reports the CoAHD indicators.