Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted

Hong Kong, China
111.11
in 2025
North Macedonia
110.51
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
48th
North Macedonia rank
49th

Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • North Macedonia
0200400600197920022025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 111.11 against 110.51 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.6.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 48th and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 99 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 110.66 142.02 31.35 North Macedonia
2000s 114.25 96.69 17.56 Hong Kong, China
2010s 99.81 101.05 1.24 North Macedonia
2020s 107.56 107.15 0.4125 Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nominal effective exchange rate (neer), index (2010=100) weighted, Hong Kong, China or North Macedonia?
Hong Kong, China, at 111.11 against 110.51 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in nominal effective exchange rate (neer), index (2010=100) weighted between Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
0.6, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and North Macedonia rank globally for nominal effective exchange rate (neer), index (2010=100) weighted?
Hong Kong, China ranks 48th and North Macedonia ranks 49th of 99 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/nominal-effective-exchange-rate-neer-index-2010-100-weighted-index/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/nominal-effective-exchange-rate-neer-index-2010-100-weighted-index/hong-kong-sar-china/north-macedonia/">Hong Kong, China vs North Macedonia: Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
100 places, 4,521 data points, 1979–2025
Last refreshed

The Effective Exchange Rate (EER) dataset includes annual, quarterly and monthly nominal and real effective exchange rates by economy. Nominal effective exchange rates (NEERs) measure the value of a country's currency in relation to a weighted average of the currency values of their major trading partners. Real effective exchange rates (REERs) adjust the NEER to account for a country's inflation rate in relation to the weighted inflation rate of their major trading partners. The IMF publishes NEERs and REERs for approximately 90 IMF member countries that account for the vast share of global international trade. These statistics help policymakers and analysts assess the competitiveness of a country's exports, monitor currency trends, evaluate the impact of exchange rate changes on trade flows, and inform decisions regarding monetary policy, exchange rate management, and international trade. The EERs are calculated by IMF staff using exchange rate information, consumer price indexes received from national authorities and international trade weights. These weights are calculated as three-year averages of annual data available from official sources on trade, tourism and manufacturing collected from the United Nations (UN), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), World Bank, World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).