Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted

Chile
79.51
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
85.41
in 2025
Chile rank
74th
Papua New Guinea rank
71st

Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted over time

  • Chile
  • Papua New Guinea
50100150200250197920022025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 85.41 against 79.51 in Chile, a difference of 5.9.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Chile ranks 74th and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 99 countries.

Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1970s 72.25 180.44 108.2 Papua New Guinea
1980s 60.67 203.39 142.73 Papua New Guinea
1990s 97.5 211.16 113.66 Papua New Guinea
2000s 95.16 104.01 8.86 Papua New Guinea
2010s 96.92 106.97 10.05 Papua New Guinea
2020s 82.9 92.45 9.55 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher nominal effective exchange rate (neer), index (2010=100) weighted, Chile or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 85.41 against 79.51 in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in nominal effective exchange rate (neer), index (2010=100) weighted between Chile and Papua New Guinea?
5.9, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Papua New Guinea?
47 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2025.
How do Chile and Papua New Guinea rank globally for nominal effective exchange rate (neer), index (2010=100) weighted?
Chile ranks 74th and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 99 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/nominal-effective-exchange-rate-neer-index-2010-100-weighted-index/chile/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/nominal-effective-exchange-rate-neer-index-2010-100-weighted-index/chile/papua-new-guinea/">Chile vs Papua New Guinea: Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Nominal effective exchange rate (NEER), Index (2010=100) Weighted index
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
100 places, 4,521 data points, 1979–2025
Last refreshed

The Effective Exchange Rate (EER) dataset includes annual, quarterly and monthly nominal and real effective exchange rates by economy. Nominal effective exchange rates (NEERs) measure the value of a country's currency in relation to a weighted average of the currency values of their major trading partners. Real effective exchange rates (REERs) adjust the NEER to account for a country's inflation rate in relation to the weighted inflation rate of their major trading partners. The IMF publishes NEERs and REERs for approximately 90 IMF member countries that account for the vast share of global international trade. These statistics help policymakers and analysts assess the competitiveness of a country's exports, monitor currency trends, evaluate the impact of exchange rate changes on trade flows, and inform decisions regarding monetary policy, exchange rate management, and international trade. The EERs are calculated by IMF staff using exchange rate information, consumer price indexes received from national authorities and international trade weights. These weights are calculated as three-year averages of annual data available from official sources on trade, tourism and manufacturing collected from the United Nations (UN), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), World Bank, World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO).