Mali vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad)

Mali
674.68 billion current LCU
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
788.01 billion current LCU
in 2025
Mali rank
39th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
37th

Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) over time

  • Mali
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0500.0B1.0T1.5T196719962025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 788.01 billion current LCU against 674.68 billion current LCU in Mali, a difference of 113.33 billion current LCU.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times Mali's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Mali ranks 39th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 37th of 202 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 66.65 billion current LCU 90.95 billion current LCU 24.30 billion current LCU Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 144.00 billion current LCU 618.91 billion current LCU 474.91 billion current LCU Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 765.70 billion current LCU 1.09 trillion current LCU 326.88 billion current LCU Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 762.10 billion current LCU 1.25 trillion current LCU 485.11 billion current LCU Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher net secondary income (net current transfers from abroad), Mali or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 788.01 billion current LCU against 674.68 billion current LCU in Mali as of 2025.
What is the difference in net secondary income (net current transfers from abroad) between Mali and Tanzania, United Republic of?
113.33 billion current LCU, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Tanzania, United Republic of?
28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
How do Mali and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for net secondary income (net current transfers from abroad)?
Mali ranks 39th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 37th of 202 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mali vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad). Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/net-secondary-income-net-current-transfers-from-abroad-current-lcu/mali/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/net-secondary-income-net-current-transfers-from-abroad-current-lcu/mali/tanzania/">Mali vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Net secondary income (Net current transfers from abroad) (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
202 places, 8,149 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Net secondary income (from abroad) comprises transfers of income between residents of the reporting country and the rest of the world that carry no provisions for repayment. Net secondary income is equal to the unrequited transfers of income from nonresidents to residents minus the unrequited transfers from residents to nonresidents. This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This series is expressed in local currency units.