Congo vs Zambia: Mining and quarrying, value added (current LCU)

Congo
4.71 trillion current LCU
in 2011
Zambia
3.10 trillion current LCU
in 2011
Congo rank
5th
Zambia rank
8th

Mining and quarrying, value added (current LCU) over time

  • Congo
  • Zambia
01.0T2.0T3.0T4.0T5.0T196519882011

How they compare

Congo currently reports 4.71 trillion current LCU against 3.10 trillion current LCU in Zambia, a difference of 1.61 trillion current LCU.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Zambia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 47 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Zambia ahead.

Congo ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 8th of 50 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 5 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 280.00 million current LCU 415.60 million current LCU 135.60 million current LCU Zambia
1970s 24.44 billion current LCU 374.33 million current LCU 24.07 billion current LCU Congo
1980s 231.97 billion current LCU 1.97 billion current LCU 230.00 billion current LCU Congo
1990s 388.43 billion current LCU 264.42 billion current LCU 124.01 billion current LCU Congo
2000s 2.02 trillion current LCU 1.12 trillion current LCU 899.06 billion current LCU Congo
2010s 4.37 trillion current LCU 2.97 trillion current LCU 1.40 trillion current LCU Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mining and quarrying, value added, Congo or Zambia?
Congo, at 4.71 trillion current LCU against 3.10 trillion current LCU in Zambia as of 2011.
What is the difference in mining and quarrying, value added between Congo and Zambia?
1.61 trillion current LCU, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zambia?
47 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2011.
How do Congo and Zambia rank globally for mining and quarrying, value added?
Congo ranks 5th and Zambia ranks 8th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Mining and quarrying, value added (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zambia: Mining and quarrying, value added. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. Retrieved 15 November 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-current-lcu/congo-rep/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/mining-and-quarrying-value-added-current-lcu/congo-rep/zambia/">Congo vs Zambia: Mining and quarrying, value added</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mining and quarrying, value added (current LCU)
Unit
current LCU
Source
World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
50 places, 1,670 data points, 1965–2011
Last refreshed

Value added in mining and quarrying is defined as the value of output of the mining and quarrying industries less the value of intermediate consumption (intermediate inputs). Mining and quarrying is a subset of industry (ISIC 10-14). Data are in current local currency.