Mozambique vs Namibia: Mining and quarrying, value added
Mozambique
1.73 billion constant LCU
in 2007
Namibia
3.23 billion constant LCU
in 2011
Mozambique rank
32nd
Namibia rank
29th
Mining and quarrying, value added over time
- Mozambique
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3.23 billion constant LCU against 1.73 billion constant LCU in Mozambique, a difference of 1.50 billion constant LCU.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.9 times Mozambique's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 29th of 45 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mining and quarrying, value added, Mozambique or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 3.23 billion constant LCU against 1.73 billion constant LCU in Mozambique as of 2011.
- What is the difference in mining and quarrying, value added between Mozambique and Namibia?
- 1.50 billion constant LCU, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Namibia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2007.
- How do Mozambique and Namibia rank globally for mining and quarrying, value added?
- Mozambique ranks 32nd and Namibia ranks 29th of 45 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files, published as Mining and quarrying, value added (constant LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Value added in mining and quarrying is defined as the value of output of the mining and quarrying industries less the value of intermediate consumption (intermediate inputs). Mining and quarrying is a subset of industry (ISIC 10-14). Data are in constant local currency.